Mathieu van der Poel Altitude training camp

The Pros and Cons of Altitude Training Camps

Could a poorly timed or poorly executed altitude training camp really have diminished Mathieu van der Poel from a champion to pack fodder? He seems to think so, and there’s a good chance he’s right.

Alpecin–Deceuninck’s Mathieu van der Poel blamed too much training at altitude for his lackluster performance and early withdrawal from the 2022 Tour de France. He told Dutch media outlet NSO, “I mainly think that something went wrong with the altitude training after the Giro towards the Tour.”

Athletes use altitude training camps to stimulate the production of red blood cells, thereby increasing the oxygen carrying capacity of their blood. There are other benefits, too, but the increase in red blood cells is the most familiar. However, training at altitude can have significant drawbacks. Mistakes with altitude training can hurt performance more than help it. With van der Poel’s experience as an example, let’s look at the rationale behind altitude training camps, as well as the risks and potential benefits associated with them.

Mathieu van der Poel path to a forgettable Tour de France

Mathieu van der Poel is one of the strongest, most dynamic riders in professional cycling. A champion in road, cyclocross, and mountain bike disciplines, the Dutch rider excels in hard one-day races. In May 2022 he rode his first Giro d’Italia – and was quite successful. He won the first stage, wore the maglia rosa for three days, rode in breakaways on five stages, and finished third in the final time trial.

With only one month between them, performing well in the Giro d’Italia in May and then the Tour de France in July can be a challenge. The tricky part is recovering from the stress of the Giro while also taking advantage of the training stimulus that only a Grand Tour can produce.

This was the first year Van der Poel attempted to ride the Giro-Tour combo. He utilized an altitude training camp after the Giro as part of the strategy to prepare for the Tour de France. Unfortunately, after a fifth-place finish in the opening time trial, he was nearly invisible in the peloton. Then, after attacking and riding in the breakaway with Jumbo-Visma’s Wout Van Aert during Stage 11, van der Poel abandoned before the start of the Col du Galibier later in the same stage.

Could the altitude training camp have caused his Tour de France woes? You bet. So, before you incorporate one into your training plan, read below to learn more about the risks and rewards of altitude training camps.

What is an altitude training camp (ATC)?

An altitude training camp is when an athlete or team spends a chunk of time training, and presumably living and sleeping, at elevations higher than about 6,000 feet above sea level. Some ATCs are short, just a few days, and others last three weeks or more. As I’ll describe later, there’s a big difference in the goals and outcomes of ATCs of varying durations.

Athletes at most ATCs train, live, and sleep at elevations between 6,000 and 9,000 feet above sea level for the duration of the camp. Some locations – including Woodland Park-to-Colorado Springs and Flagstaff-to-Phoenix – offer the option to live and sleep at altitude, then descend and train at elevations thousands of feet lower. This method is known as “Live High, Train Low”.

Still another option for ATCs involves living, sleeping, and training at altitude, but incorporates supplemental oxygen during some specific high-intensity interval sessions.

How altitude affects endurance performance

The basics of altitude work like this: as you go higher the air becomes less dense, which means the oxygen molecules are more spread out. As a result, when you breathe in and fill your lungs, there are fewer oxygen molecules in that volume of air.

Most people from sea level don’t notice any difference at elevations up to about 5,000 feet above sea level. Between 5,000 and 8,000 feet, most healthy people feel perfectly fine at rest. They might get out of breath more quickly while exercising. The impact of “moderate” elevation is relatively minor because your lungs are very good at extracting oxygen from air. You’re still able to satisfy the body’s needs, even as the air gets thinner.

Once you get above about 8,000 feet, things are a bit different. At these higher elevations people who normally live at sea level get out of breath just walking up a flight of stairs. Your heart rate and breathing rates at rest will be slightly elevated as your body tries to pull more air through the lungs so it can grab the oxygen it wants.

When you exercise at altitude, you reach your maximum sustainable pace or intensity level much more quickly than at sea level. This means that if your lactate threshold power is 250 watts at sea level, at 8,000 feet above sea level you’ll likely reach lactate threshold at about 225 watts (a 10% decline). You’ll be slower riding uphill, or you’ll need to push yourself harder than normal to achieve the same speed you can hold on a climb at sea level. As you go even higher, your maximum sustainable power will keep dropping, and it will become increasingly difficult to recover from hard efforts above lactate threshold.

How Altitude Training Camps Work

Considering how detrimental altitude is to endurance performance, why would any athlete choose to do an ATC? Well, because exposure to higher elevations triggers a cascade of changes that help humans adapt to living and exercising in high altitude environments. The most well-known adaptation is an increase in hematocrit, or the volume of red blood cells in your blood.

In the short term, increased relative hematocrit results from a reduction in blood plasma volume. This happens in a matter of days. There’s no change in the number of red blood cells. You just lose plasma volume, which is mostly water. In the long term, altitude exposure leads to increased secretion of your body’s own erythropoietin (EPO), which stimulates increased red blood cell production. This takes a lot longer, a minimum of three weeks and potentially up to six weeks.

For intermittent altitude exposure, whether from a “live high, train low” scenario or a simulated version of it utilizing an altitude tent, the duration of daily altitude exposure matters. The common recommendation is real or simulated altitude exposure for at least 12 hours/day for at least 21 consecutive days. As an example, a 2019 study had subjects spend 12 hours/day at a simulated altitude of 3,000 meters above sea level for 21 consecutive days (Park et al 2019).

How long do the effects of a long altitude camp last?

Let’s say you manage to conduct a three-week altitude training camp and everything goes perfectly. (We’ll talk later about how things can go less-than-perfectly.) You leave your ATC with an elevated hematocrit and travel to sea level for competition or to continue training.

Free Cycling Training Assessment Quiz

Take our free 2-minute quiz to discover how effective your training is and get recommendations for how you can improve.

What happens? That depends on the athlete, their cumulative exposures to altitude over a period of months or years, and their post-camp activities. In a 2019 narrative review in Sports Medicine, authors Iñigo Mujika, Avish Sharma, and Trent Stellingwerff included findings that ranged from a few days to several weeks. Some athletes achieved their best post-altitude performances within 3-5 days of returning to sea level. Others performed best about 3-4 weeks after returning to sea level. Like many aspects of training, there appears to be significant individual variability in the decay of altitude camp benefits.

What about short altitude camps?

Many athletes preparing for competitions at altitude participate in short ATCs, typically lasting 2-7 days. These are often reconnaissance trips to pre-ride or pre-run parts of a particular course. The duration of altitude exposure during these ATCs is too short to cause an increase in red blood cell production. So, why bother?

Short ATCs are useful for learning how your body responds to acute altitude exposure. Few athletes have the time to spend 3 weeks living at altitude to achieve the increase in red blood cells. Nor do they have the time for repeated 1-2 week ATCs throughout the season – another method of incrementally achieving the benefits of altitude exposure.

The common scenario for a sea level athlete is to arrive at altitude the day before a competition. This allows them to race before feeling the effects of fatigue and disturbed sleep they may experience after another few days at altitude. Short recon ATCs help athletes adjust their pacing, target power outputs, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for efforts at altitude.

The downsides of altitude training camps

If everything goes right, an ATC can lead to an increase in hematocrit, which increases the amount of oxygen athletes can deliver to working muscles. The problem is that lots of things can go wrong. And when they do, athletes may perform worse after an ATC than before it.

Here are some of the ways an ATC can hurt performance more than it helps:

  • You can’t train as hard

    Characteristically, the training focus during ATCs is on long, easy endurance rides or runs. Hard interval workouts are generally unproductive in the first 1-2 weeks of an ATC. Athletes can’t achieve the target intensities necessary. Zone 2 aerobic endurance training is the most effective use of time. That’s great during certain parts of the training year but can be a problem when you are trying to build or retain race fitness.

  • Recovery is hindered

    Post-workout recovery is slower during an ATC, particularly in the first 1-2 weeks. Even if athletes are diligent about keeping training intensity low, those rides or runs take more out of them than they expect. This recovery response is highly individual, may be affected by iron status, and may be affected by how rested an athlete is before the ATC.

  • Sleep quality can decline

    Sleep is the best possible activity for promoting recovery. Both the duration and quality of sleep are important, but many athletes have trouble sleeping at altitude. Although this is highly individual, some people have trouble getting to sleep and staying asleep at altitude. The problem tends to get worse the higher you go.

  • Greater potential for dehydration

    Humidity levels are lower at altitude than at sea level. As a result, people lose more fluid through respiration because you must humidify the air you breathe in. Sweat evaporates very quickly. And remember, a reduction in blood plasma volume (mostly water is one of the first responses to altitude exposure. This gradually subsides but can be problematic for athletes early in an ATC.

What you can learn from Mathieu Van de Poel’s experience

Mathieu van der Poel traveled to an ATC soon after finishing his first Giro d’Italia. It’s safe to say he was fatigued after a three-week Grand Tour. So, it is possible he hadn’t recovered enough prior to the ATC. It’s also possible he did more training or incorporated more intensity than he could effectively balance with recovery at altitude. Maybe his sleep quality suffered by trying to sleep at a higher elevation. Most likely, it was a combination of factors.

So, who screwed up? Presumably, van der Poel had participated in numerous ATCs prior to the one in June of 2022. He and his coaches and the team sports scientists most likely had plenty of historical data to guide his pre-Tour de France ATC. The fatigue from the Giro d’Italia was the wildcard. It was a novel training stress, so what worked before may not have worked this time. But hindsight is 20/20 and it’s easy to criticize once you know the result. He and his performance team took a chance and it didn’t pan out.

Athletes aren’t machines. They’re people and they don’t always respond to stimuli exactly the way you expect or hope it will. The longer we coach an athlete, the more we learn about their individual responses to things like temperature, hydration status, specific foods, volume of intensity, recovery periods, and altitude training.


By Jim Rutberg,
CTS Pro Coach, co-author of “The Time Crunched Cyclist” and “Training Essentials for Ultrarunning”


Mujika I, Sharma AP, Stellingwerff T. Contemporary Periodization of Altitude Training for Elite Endurance Athletes: A Narrative Review. Sports Med. 2019 Nov;49(11):1651-1669. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01165-y. PMID: 31452130.

Park HY, Park W, Lim K. Living High-Training Low for 21 Days Enhances Exercise Economy, Hemodynamic Function, and Exercise Performance of Competitive Runners. J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Aug 1;18(3):427-437. PMID: 31427864; PMCID: PMC6683611.

FREE Mini-Course: Learn How to Maximize Your Limited Training Time

Learn step-by-step how to overcome limited training time and get faster. Walk away with a personalized plan to increase your performance.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Comments 8

  1. Pingback: High Altitude vs Sea Level Training: Pros & Cons

  2. Pingback: What is the disadvantage of altitude oxygen tents?

  3. Pingback: The Marangu Park: The Most Popular And Oldest Park In Tanzania –

  4. Pingback: Trainright Guide to Heart Rate Training for Cycling - CTS

  5. Thank you very much, for this great article about ATC.
    I enjoyed reading and learning from it.

    Thank you CTS and coaches, for your input and effort, creating such great articles.

    Greats from a Dutch cycling coach/trainer.

  6. What sort of change in altitude is beneficial? For example, I live near 7000, how much benefit is there to living and training at 10,000 for alpine road and MTB events?

  7. Getting ready to race Steamboat in two weeks. Steamboat tops out at 9000 feet and I live just above sea level. We have a local altitude chamber. I will train 4 times, 2 hours each (8 hours total) at endurance levels in the chamber set at 9000 feet. Then return to my normal altitude for recovery. I will also ride and train between those altitude sessions at normal altitude. My last altitude training session is four days before Steamboat. Thoughts? Should I expect any sort of positive effect from the training? An interesting experiment either way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *